1996 Rover 200 vs. 2011 Ford S-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford S-Max is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford S-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford S-Max (160 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (102 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford S-Max should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Rover 200 | 2011 Ford S-Max | |
Make | Rover | Ford |
Model | 200 | S-Max |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1395 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 160 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |