1996 Rover 200 vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 258 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (102 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200.
Because 2012 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (127 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Rover 200 | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Rover | Holden |
| Model | 200 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1395 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 127 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
