1996 Rover 220 vs. 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4
To start off, 1996 Rover 220 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 2,138 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4 (104 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1996 Rover 220. (103 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4 should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 220 weights approximately 199 kg more than 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4.
Because 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 220, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Rover 220 | 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4 | |
Make | Rover | Triumph |
Model | 220 | Dove GTR4 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 2138 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1214 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 29 L |