1996 Rover 220 vs. 2003 MG ZT

To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 220 would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZT (129 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1996 Rover 220. (103 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT weights approximately 271 kg more than 1996 Rover 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT (300 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 220. (210 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 220. 2003 MG ZT has automatic transmission and 1996 Rover 220 has manual transmission. 1996 Rover 220 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MG ZT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Rover 220 2003 MG ZT
Make Rover MG
Model 220 ZT
Year Released 1996 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1993 cc 1951 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 103 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 300 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 1900 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1214 kg 1485 kg
Vehicle Length 3980 mm 4760 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2760 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]