1996 Rover 220 vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 220 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 254 more horse power than 1996 Rover 220. (103 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 220.
Because 2008 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 220, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 320 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 220. (210 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Rover 220 | 2008 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Rover | Holden |
| Model | 220 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1993 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 103 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
