1996 Rover 400 vs. 1982 Triumph Acclaim
To start off, 1996 Rover 400 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Triumph Acclaim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Triumph Acclaim would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Triumph Acclaim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Triumph Acclaim (150 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1996 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Triumph Acclaim should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 400.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Triumph Acclaim (245 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Triumph Acclaim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Rover 400 | 1982 Triumph Acclaim | |
Make | Rover | Triumph |
Model | 400 | Acclaim |
Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2330 mm |