1996 Rover 400 vs. 2004 Scion xB
To start off, 2004 Scion xB is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 400 would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 400 (109 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2004 Scion xB. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 400 should accelerate faster than 2004 Scion xB.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Rover 400 (145 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Scion xB. (142 Nm). This means 1996 Rover 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Scion xB.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Rover 400 | 2004 Scion xB | |
Make | Rover | Scion |
Model | 400 | xB |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 142 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2510 mm |