1996 Rover 400 vs. 2011 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2011 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 400 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1996 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 400.
Because 2011 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Rover 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jeep Wrangler (321 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Rover 400 | 2011 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Rover | Jeep |
Model | 400 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 321 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3881 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1826 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2423 mm |