1996 Saturn SL vs. 2005 Scion xA
To start off, 2005 Scion xA is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Saturn SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Saturn SL would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Saturn SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Scion xA (108 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1996 Saturn SL. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Scion xA should accelerate faster than 1996 Saturn SL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Scion xA weights approximately 5 kg more than 1996 Saturn SL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Saturn SL (158 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Scion xA. (142 Nm). This means 1996 Saturn SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Scion xA.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Saturn SL | 2005 Scion xA | |
| Make | Saturn | Scion |
| Model | SL | xA |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1056 kg | 1061 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1540 mm |
