1996 Seat Inca Kombi vs. 2000 Citroen C3

To start off, 2000 Citroen C3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Seat Inca Kombi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Seat Inca Kombi would be higher. At 1,391 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Seat Inca Kombi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen C3 (72 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1996 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen C3 weights approximately 51 kg more than 1996 Seat Inca Kombi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen C3 (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Seat Inca Kombi. (108 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Seat Inca Kombi. 2000 Citroen C3 has automatic transmission and 1996 Seat Inca Kombi has manual transmission. 1996 Seat Inca Kombi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Citroen C3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: