1996 Seat Inca Kombi vs. 2003 Suzuki Lapin
To start off, 2003 Suzuki Lapin is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Seat Inca Kombi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Seat Inca Kombi would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Seat Inca Kombi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Seat Inca Kombi (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2003 Suzuki Lapin. (62 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Seat Inca Kombi should accelerate faster than 2003 Suzuki Lapin. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 285 kg more than 2003 Suzuki Lapin. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Seat Inca Kombi (127 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Suzuki Lapin. (106 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Seat Inca Kombi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Suzuki Lapin.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Seat Inca Kombi | 2003 Suzuki Lapin | |
Make | Seat | Suzuki |
Model | Inca Kombi | Lapin |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 60.4 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 820 kg |