1996 Seat Inca Kombi vs. 2005 Volkswagen Caddy
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Seat Inca Kombi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Seat Inca Kombi would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Volkswagen Caddy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Caddy (68 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1996 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Caddy should accelerate faster than 1996 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volkswagen Caddy weights approximately 497 kg more than 1996 Seat Inca Kombi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volkswagen Caddy (140 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Seat Inca Kombi. (108 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2005 Volkswagen Caddy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Seat Inca Kombi.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Seat Inca Kombi | 2005 Volkswagen Caddy | |
Make | Seat | Volkswagen |
Model | Inca Kombi | Caddy |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1391 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1532 kg |