1996 Seat Marbella vs. 1965 Seat 1500
To start off, 1996 Seat Marbella is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,481 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Seat 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Seat 1500 (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1996 Seat Marbella. (40 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Seat 1500 should accelerate faster than 1996 Seat Marbella. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Seat 1500 weights approximately 480 kg more than 1996 Seat Marbella. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Seat Marbella, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Seat Marbella | 1965 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | Seat | Seat |
| Model | Marbella | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 901 cc | 1481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3480 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2660 mm |
