1996 Seat Toledo vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1996 Seat Toledo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Seat Toledo (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Seat Toledo should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1996 Seat Toledo.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Seat Toledo (181 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Seat Toledo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Seat Toledo | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Seat | Triumph |
Model | Toledo | 2000 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 64 L |