1996 Seat Toledo vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 1996 Seat Toledo is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Seat Toledo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Seat Toledo weights approximately 481 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Seat Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Seat Toledo (145 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 Seat Toledo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Seat Toledo | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Seat | Seat |
Model | Toledo | 600 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 767 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1056 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2010 mm |