1996 Skoda Octavia vs. 2012 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pixo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Skoda Octavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Skoda Octavia would be higher. At 1,894 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Skoda Octavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1996 Skoda Octavia. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 1996 Skoda Octavia.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Skoda Octavia | 2012 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Skoda | Nissan |
| Model | Octavia | Pixo |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1894 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 68 HP |
| Top Speed | 159 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2360 mm |
