1996 SsangYong Korando vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 SsangYong Korando. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 SsangYong Korando would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1996 SsangYong Korando. (216 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Stavic should accelerate faster than 1996 SsangYong Korando.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 SsangYong Korando. (307 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 SsangYong Korando.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 SsangYong Korando | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
| Make | SsangYong | SsangYong |
| Model | Korando | Stavic |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 3197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 307 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 89.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1880 mm |
