1996 SsangYong Musso vs. 1984 Volkswagen Golf
To start off, 1996 SsangYong Musso is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Volkswagen Golf. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Volkswagen Golf would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 SsangYong Musso (217 HP) has 164 more horse power than 1984 Volkswagen Golf. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 1984 Volkswagen Golf. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 1145 kg more than 1984 Volkswagen Golf. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Volkswagen Golf. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 SsangYong Musso (307 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Volkswagen Golf. (96 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1996 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Volkswagen Golf. 1996 SsangYong Musso has automatic transmission and 1984 Volkswagen Golf has manual transmission. 1984 Volkswagen Golf will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 SsangYong Musso will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 SsangYong Musso | 1984 Volkswagen Golf | |
Make | SsangYong | Volkswagen |
Model | Musso | Golf |
Year Released | 1996 | 1984 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3197 cc | 1272 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 307 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2090 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 55 L |