1996 SsangYong Musso vs. 2010 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Stilo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 SsangYong Musso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 SsangYong Musso would be higher. At 2,446 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Fiat Stilo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 SsangYong Musso | 2010 Fiat Stilo | |
| Make | SsangYong | Fiat |
| Model | Musso | Stilo |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2297 cc | 2446 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1480 mm |
