1996 SsangYong Musso vs. 2012 Ford E-350
To start off, 2012 Ford E-350 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 SsangYong Musso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 SsangYong Musso would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Ford E-350 has automatic transmission and 1996 SsangYong Musso has manual transmission. 1996 SsangYong Musso will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Ford E-350 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 SsangYong Musso | 2012 Ford E-350 | |
Make | SsangYong | Ford |
Model | Musso | E-350 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2297 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 255 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 2111 mm |