1996 Subaru Outback vs. 2012 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2012 Ford Mustang is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Subaru Outback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Subaru Outback would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Mustang (412 HP) has 247 more horse power than 1996 Subaru Outback. (165 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1996 Subaru Outback.
Because 1996 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Mustang (528 Nm) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Subaru Outback. (221 Nm). This means 2012 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Subaru Outback | 2012 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Subaru | Ford |
Model | Outback | Mustang |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 412 HP |
Torque | 221 Nm | 528 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1417 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2720 mm |