1996 Suzuki Baleno vs. 1976 Triumph Stag
To start off, 1996 Suzuki Baleno is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Triumph Stag. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Triumph Stag would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Triumph Stag (143 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (119 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Triumph Stag should accelerate faster than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Triumph Stag weights approximately 125 kg more than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Triumph Stag (234 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (153 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1976 Triumph Stag will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Suzuki Baleno.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Suzuki Baleno | 1976 Triumph Stag | |
Make | Suzuki | Triumph |
Model | Baleno | Stag |
Year Released | 1996 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1839 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 234 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2550 mm |