1996 Suzuki Baleno vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Suzuki Baleno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Suzuki Baleno would be higher. At 2,901 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 149 more horse power than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (119 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1021 kg more than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo XC90 (380 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (153 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2004 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Suzuki Baleno.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Suzuki Baleno | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Suzuki | Volvo |
Model | Baleno | XC90 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1839 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 268 HP |
Torque | 153 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 2106 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2870 mm |