1996 Suzuki Baleno vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Suzuki Baleno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Suzuki Baleno would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 123 more horse power than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (119 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1996 Suzuki Baleno.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (152 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Suzuki Baleno.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Suzuki Baleno | 2009 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Suzuki | Holden |
| Model | Baleno | UTE |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1839 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 152 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
