1996 Suzuki Baleno vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Suzuki Baleno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Suzuki Baleno would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (119 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1996 Suzuki Baleno.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C70 (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (152 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Suzuki Baleno.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Suzuki Baleno | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Suzuki | Volvo |
| Model | Baleno | C70 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1839 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 224 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 152 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |
