1996 Suzuki Baleno vs. 2010 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC70 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Suzuki Baleno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Suzuki Baleno would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC70 (217 HP) has 98 more horse power than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (119 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 795 kg more than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo XC70 (440 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (153 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Suzuki Baleno.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Suzuki Baleno | 2010 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | Suzuki | Volvo |
Model | Baleno | XC70 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1839 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 217 HP |
Torque | 153 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2815 mm |