1996 Suzuki Baleno vs. 2011 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford C-Max is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Suzuki Baleno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Suzuki Baleno would be higher. At 1,839 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Suzuki Baleno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Suzuki Baleno (119 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2011 Ford C-Max. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Suzuki Baleno should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford C-Max weights approximately 515 kg more than 1996 Suzuki Baleno.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Suzuki Baleno (152 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Ford C-Max. (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Suzuki Baleno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Ford C-Max.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Suzuki Baleno | 2011 Ford C-Max | |
| Make | Suzuki | Ford |
| Model | Baleno | C-Max |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1839 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 152 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1828 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2788 mm |
