1996 Suzuki Vitara vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 1996 Suzuki Vitara is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Suzuki Vitara (86 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 260. (81 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Suzuki Vitara should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 260. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 260 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1996 Suzuki Vitara.
Because 1996 Suzuki Vitara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Volvo 260. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Suzuki Vitara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Suzuki Vitara (216 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 260. (140 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1996 Suzuki Vitara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Suzuki Vitara | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Suzuki | Volvo |
Model | Vitara | 260 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1450 kg |