1996 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2010 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 207 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 2,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota 4Runner (123 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 207. (121 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 207.
Because 1996 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Peugeot 207. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Toyota 4Runner | 2010 Peugeot 207 | |
| Make | Toyota | Peugeot |
| Model | 4Runner | 207 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2982 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 121 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1972 mm |
