1996 Toyota Celica vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Celica (173 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Toyota Celica | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Toyota | Ford |
| Model | Celica | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1986 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2490 mm |
