1996 Toyota Chaser vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota Chaser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota Chaser would be higher. Both 1996 Toyota Chaser and 2010 Toyota Matrix are equipped with a 2,400 cc engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 24 kg more than 1996 Toyota Chaser.
Because 1996 Toyota Chaser is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Toyota Chaser. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Toyota Chaser | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Toyota | Toyota |
Model | Chaser | Matrix |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1424 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4394 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1765 mm |