1996 Toyota Conquest vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota Conquest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota Conquest would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (272 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1996 Toyota Conquest. (174 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1996 Toyota Conquest. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 493 kg more than 1996 Toyota Conquest. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 6 (364 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Toyota Conquest. (135 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Toyota Conquest.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Toyota Conquest | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Toyota | Mazda |
| Model | Conquest | 6 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1973 cc | 3700 cc |
| Horse Power | 174 HP | 272 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 364 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1609 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2789 mm |
