1996 Toyota Cresta vs. 1975 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1996 Toyota Cresta is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Cresta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Cresta (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1975 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Cresta should accelerate faster than 1975 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota Cresta weights approximately 175 kg more than 1975 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota Cresta (255 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1996 Toyota Cresta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Toyota Cresta | 1975 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Toyota | Triumph |
Model | Cresta | 2000 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 255 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2700 mm |