1996 Toyota Hi-Ace vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1996 Toyota Hi-Ace is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,446 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Hi-Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Hi-Ace (90 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Hi-Ace should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota Hi-Ace weights approximately 941 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Toyota Hi-Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Toyota Hi-Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Toyota Hi-Ace | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Toyota | Zastava |
| Model | Hi-Ace | 102 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 2446 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1340 mm |
