1996 Toyota Mega Cruiser vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota Mega Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota Mega Cruiser would be higher. At 4,164 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Mega Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Mega Cruiser (153 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2010 Volvo C30. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Mega Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota Mega Cruiser weights approximately 1399 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Toyota Mega Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Mega Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Toyota Mega Cruiser | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Mega Cruiser | C30 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4164 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 101 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2850 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2180 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2290 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3400 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 108 L | 60 L |