1996 Toyota MR2 vs. 2007 Holden Barina
To start off, 2007 Holden Barina is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota MR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota MR2 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota MR2 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Toyota MR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Toyota MR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden Barina (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Toyota MR2. (186 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2007 Holden Barina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Toyota MR2.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Toyota MR2 | 2007 Holden Barina | |
Make | Toyota | Holden |
Model | MR2 | Barina |
Year Released | 1996 | 2007 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 186 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1650 mm |