1996 Toyota MR2 vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota MR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota MR2 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (148 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1996 Toyota MR2. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1996 Toyota MR2.
Because 2010 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Toyota MR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Toyota MR2 | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Toyota | Nissan |
Model | MR2 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1988 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 148 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 65 L |