1996 Toyota MR2 vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota MR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota MR2 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C (298 HP) has 224 more horse power than 1996 Toyota MR2. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1996 Toyota MR2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C (370 Nm) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Toyota MR2. (131 Nm). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Toyota MR2.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Toyota MR2 | 2013 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Toyota | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | MR2 | C |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1988 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 298 HP |
Torque | 131 Nm | 370 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1997 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1406 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2760 mm |