1996 Volkswagen Caddy vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 1996 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,848 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 260 (153 HP) has 79 more horse power than 1996 Volkswagen Caddy. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 1996 Volkswagen Caddy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 260 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1996 Volkswagen Caddy. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Volvo 260 (230 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Volkswagen Caddy. (125 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1980 Volvo 260 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Volkswagen Caddy.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Volkswagen Caddy | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Volvo |
| Model | Caddy | 260 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1440 mm |
