1996 Volkswagen Caddy vs. 2010 Mazda 2
To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volkswagen Caddy. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volkswagen Caddy would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Volkswagen Caddy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 2 (102 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1996 Volkswagen Caddy. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1996 Volkswagen Caddy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Volkswagen Caddy weights approximately 120 kg more than 2010 Mazda 2.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 2 (136 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Volkswagen Caddy. (125 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Volkswagen Caddy.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Volkswagen Caddy | 2010 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Volkswagen | Mazda |
Model | Caddy | 2 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 102 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1480 mm |