1996 Volkswagen Golf vs. 1946 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1996 Volkswagen Golf is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volkswagen Golf (115 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1946 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Golf should accelerate faster than 1946 Volvo PV 60.
Because 1946 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Golf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Volkswagen Golf | 1946 Volvo PV 60 | |
Make | Volkswagen | Volvo |
Model | Golf | PV 60 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1946 |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2850 mm |