1996 Volkswagen Golf vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 1996 Volkswagen Golf is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Volvo 140 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volkswagen Golf (115 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Golf should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Golf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Volkswagen Golf (165 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (157 Nm). This means 1996 Volkswagen Golf will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Volkswagen Golf | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Volvo |
| Model | Golf | 140 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1896 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.7 mm | 80 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2620 mm |
