1996 Volkswagen Polo vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 1,779 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Volkswagen Polo | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Volkswagen | Westfield |
Model | Polo | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 1043 cc | 1779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2320 mm |