1996 Volvo 440 vs. 2011 Citroen C-Zero
To start off, 2011 Citroen C-Zero is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volvo 440. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volvo 440 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Citroen C-Zero weights approximately 55 kg more than 1996 Volvo 440.
Because 2011 Citroen C-Zero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Citroen C-Zero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volvo 440, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Volvo 440 | 2011 Citroen C-Zero | |
Make | Volvo | Citroen |
Model | 440 | C-Zero |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1025 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1475 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2550 mm |