1996 Volvo 850 vs. 2012 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volvo 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volvo 850 would be higher. At 2,461 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Volvo 850 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volvo 850 (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2012 Ford C-Max. (95 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volvo 850 should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford C-Max weights approximately 57 kg more than 1996 Volvo 850.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Volvo 850 (290 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford C-Max. (230 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1996 Volvo 850 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford C-Max.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Volvo 850 | 2012 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Volvo | Ford |
Model | 850 | C-Max |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2461 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1493 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2788 mm |