1996 Volvo V40 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1996 Volvo V40 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Volvo V40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volvo V40 (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volvo V40 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Volvo V40 weights approximately 470 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Volvo V40 (143 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Volvo V40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Volvo V40 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Volvo | Zastava |
Model | V40 | 102 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 143 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2160 mm |