1996 Volvo V40 vs. 2011 Mazda 2
To start off, 2011 Mazda 2 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volvo V40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volvo V40 would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Volvo V40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 2 (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1996 Volvo V40. (89 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1996 Volvo V40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Volvo V40 weights approximately 199 kg more than 2011 Mazda 2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Volvo V40 (176 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda 2. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Volvo V40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Volvo V40 | 2011 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Volvo | Mazda |
Model | V40 | 2 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1870 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1046 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2489 mm |