1996 Zagato Bravo vs. 2000 Plymouth Neon
To start off, 2000 Plymouth Neon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Zagato Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Zagato Bravo would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Zagato Bravo | 2000 Plymouth Neon | |
Make | Zagato | Plymouth |
Model | Bravo | Neon |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |