1996 Zagato Bravo vs. 2010 Kia Forte
To start off, 2010 Kia Forte is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Zagato Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Zagato Bravo would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Zagato Bravo has automatic transmission and 2010 Kia Forte has manual transmission. 2010 Kia Forte will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Zagato Bravo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Zagato Bravo | 2010 Kia Forte | |
Make | Zagato | Kia |
Model | Bravo | Forte |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 173 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |