1996 Zagato Bravo vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Zagato Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Zagato Bravo would be higher.
Because 2013 Dodge CHARGER is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Dodge CHARGER. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Zagato Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Zagato Bravo | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Zagato | Dodge |
Model | Bravo | CHARGER |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 288 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |